Comet Assay Kits, 3-Well

Comet Assay Kits, 3-Well
  • Useful screening tool for various types of DNA damage
  • Slides are specially treated for adhesion of low-melting agarose
  • Easy visualization by epifluorescence microscopy

 

Frequently Asked Questions about this product

General FAQs about Oxidative Stress

Email To BuyerPrint this PageCopy Link
Ordering

Please contact your distributor for pricing.

OxiSelect™ Comet Assay Kit (3-Well Slides)
Catalog Number
STA-351-5
Size
5 x 75 assays
Detection
Fluorescence Microscopy
Manual/Data Sheet Download
SDS Download
Price
$2,095.00
OxiSelect™ Comet Assay Kit (3-Well Slides)
Catalog Number
STA-351
Size
75 assays
Detection
Fluorescence Microscopy
Manual/Data Sheet Download
SDS Download
Price
$495.00
OxiSelect™ Comet Assay Kit (3-Well Slides)
Catalog Number
STA-350
Size
15 assays
Detection
Fluorescence Microscopy
Manual/Data Sheet Download
SDS Download
Price
$255.00
Product Details

Our OxiSelect™ 3-Well Comet Assay Kits provide a fast, convenient way to screen for general DNA damage, regardless of the source or nature of the damage. Kits include Comet Slides, reagents, and a fluorescent dye to visualize cells under an epifluorescence microscope.

Epifluorescence Microscopy Visualization of DNA Damage using the OxiSelect™ Comet Assay Kit. For detailed explanation please see "Calculation of Results" section in product manual.

Etoposide Treatment of Jurkat Cells. Jurkat cells untreated (left) and treated (right) with Etoposide before performing OxiSelect™ Comet Assay under alkaline electrophoresis conditions at 33V / 300 mA for 15 minutes.

Recent Product Citations
  1. Wang, T. et al. (2021). The effects of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency on benzene-induced hematotoxicity in mice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 226:112803. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112803.
  2. Ciminera, A.K. et al. (2021). Elevated glucose increases genomic instability by inhibiting nucleotide excision repair. Life Sci Alliance. 4(10):e202101159. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202101159.
  3. Hudita, A. et al. (2021). Bioinspired silk fibroin nano-delivery systems protect against 5-FU induced gastrointestinal mucositis in a mouse model and display antitumor effects on HT-29 colorectal cancer cells in vitro. Nanotoxicology. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2021.1943032.
  4. Hung, S.Y. et al. (2021). Bavachinin Induces G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis via the ATM/ATR Signaling Pathway in Human Small Cell Lung Cancer and Shows an Antitumor Effect in the Xenograft Model. J Agric Food Chem. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01657.
  5. Cho, K. et al. Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 is induced in Huntington's disease and involved in autophagy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 559:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.04.089.
  6. Cho, D.H. et al. (2021). Far-infrared irradiation inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation independently of DNA damage through increased nuclear Ca2+/calmodulin binding modulated-activation of checkpoint kinase 2. J Photochem Photobiol B. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112188.
  7. Li, J. et al. (2021). Melatonin ameliorates cypermethrin-induced impairments by regulating oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis in porcine Sertoli cells. Theriogenology. 167:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.03.011.
  8. Li, M.Z. et al. (2021). Discovery of MTR-106 as a highly potent G-quadruplex stabilizer for treating BRCA-deficient cancers. Invest New Drugs. doi: 10.1007/s10637-021-01096-4.
  9. Jeske, R. et al. (2021). Agitation in a Microcarrier-based Spinner Flask Bioreactor Modulates Homeostasis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Biochem Eng J. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2021.107947.
  10. Zhou, W. et al. (2021). Fine polystyrene microplastics render immune responses more vulnerable to two veterinary antibiotics in a bivalve species. Mar Pollut Bull. 164:111995. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.111995.
  11. Park, K. et al. (2021). Aicardi-Goutières syndrome-associated gene SAMHD1 preserves genome integrity by preventing R-loop formation at transcription–replication conflict regions. PLoS Genet. 17(4): e1009523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009523.
  12. Ramos, H. et al. (2021). A selective p53 activator and anticancer agent to improve colorectal cancer therapy. Cell Rep. 35(2):108982. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108982.
  13. Planelló, R. et al. (2021). Genotoxic effects and transcriptional deregulation of genetic biomarkers in Chironomus riparius larvae exposed to hydroxyl- and amine-terminated generation 3 (G3) polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers. Sci Total Environ. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145828.
  14. Fan, D. et al. (2021). A Novel Salt Inducible Kinase 2 Inhibitor, ARN-3261, Sensitizes Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines and Xenografts to Carboplatin. Cancers (Basel). 13(3):446. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030446.
  15. Siemionow, M. et al. (2020). Transplantation of Dystrophin Expressing Chimeric (DEC) Human Cells of Myoblast/MSC Origin Improves Function in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Model. Stem Cells Dev. doi: 10.1089/scd.2020.0161.
  16. Lammert, C.R. et al. (2020). AIM2 inflammasome surveillance of DNA damage shapes neurodevelopment. Nature. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2174-3.
  17. Shibayama, Y. et al. (2020). Aberrant (pro)renin receptor expression induces genomic instability in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through upregulation of SMARCA5/SNF2H. Commun Biol. 3(1):724. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01434-x.
  18. Han, J. et al. (2020). Elevated CXorf67 Expression in PFA Ependymomas Suppresses DNA Repair and Sensitizes to PARP Inhibitors. Cancer Cell. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.10.009.
  19. Hays, E. et al. (2020). The SWI/SNF ATPase BRG1 stimulates DNA end resection and homologous recombination by reducing nucleosome density at DNA double strand breaks and by promoting the recruitment of the CtIP nuclease. Cell Cycle. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2020.1831256.
  20. Ibnu Rasid, E.N. et al. (2020). Effect of Dioscorea hispida var. Daemona (Roxb) Prain & Burkill on Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage in the Liver of Pregnant Rats. Int J Biomed Sci. 16(3).
  21. Le, B.V. et al. (2020). TGFβR-SMAD3 Signaling Induces Resistance to PARP Inhibitors in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment. Cell Rep. 33(1):108221. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108221.
  22. Klotz-Noack, K. et al. (2020). SFPQ Depletion Is Synthetically Lethal with BRAFV600E in Colorectal Cancer Cells. Cell Rep. 32(12):108184. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108184.
  23. Ito, S.S. et al. (2020). Inhibition of the ATR kinase enhances 5-FU sensitivity independently of non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination repair pathways. J Biol Chem. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013726.
  24. Klak, M. et al. (2020). Irradiation with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength shows differences in DNA damage of swine pancreatic islets. PLoS One. 15(6):e0235052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235052.
  25. Khalil, A.M. et al. (2020).  Association between Mobile Phone Using and DNA Damage of Epithelial Cells of the Oral Mucosa. J Biotechnol Biomed. 3(2020): 50-66. doi: 10.26502/jbb.2642-91280027.
  26. Wang, Y. et al. (2020). Targeting therapeutic vulnerabilities with PARP inhibition and radiation in IDH-mutant gliomas and cholangiocarcinomas. Sci Adv. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz3221.
  27. Fang, Y. et al. (2020). Epigenetic dysregulation of Mdr1b in the blood-testis barrier contributes to dyszoospermia in mice exposed to cadmium. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 190:110142. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110142.
  28. Cupello, S. et al. (2019). Distinct roles of XRCC1 in genome integrity in Xenopus egg extracts. Biochem J. 476(24):3791-3804. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20190798.
  29. Naci, D. et al. (2019). Cell adhesion to collagen promotes leukemia resistance to doxorubicin by reducing DNA damage through the inhibition of Rac1 activation. Sci Rep. 9(1):19455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55934-w.
  30. Lu, S. et al. (2019). Additive effects of a small molecular PCNA inhibitor PCNA-I1S and DNA damaging agents on growth inhibition and DNA damage in prostate and lung cancer cells. PLoS One. 14(10):e0223894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223894.